Postal agreements prior to the General Postal Union/Universal Postal Union in 1875 were highly diverse, though they show increased uniformity over time from 1850 to 1875 in Europe. This post focuses on mail between France and Belgium beginning with the 1847 postal convention between these nations. Last edited: Mar 2, 2021
Organization of this Post
- Postal Arrangements Prior to 1847
- Postal Arrangements from 1847 - 1875
- Prepaid Letter Mail France to Belgium
- 1857 Convention Prepaid Letters
- 1865 Convention Prepaid Letters
- Belgium to France Prepaid Rates
- 1857 Convention Prepaid Letters
- 1865 Convention Prepaid Letters
- Border Mail
- 1857 Convention Border Rate Paid
- Border Crossings
- Notes About Railways and Exchange Offices
- Belgium Frees Itself from the Netherlands
- Resources and Links
- Related Blog Posts
Postal Arrangements Prior to 1847
Rather than cite the postal instructions of the time, I will simply illustrate a folded letter that falls under this postal arrangement.
Item #1 - Unpaid letter from Bruxelles to Bordeaux 1845
Bruxelles Dec 11, 1845
B.3.R. (in green) Bordeaux Dec 15, 1845 (verso) Bordeaux Dec 16, 1845 (verso) "14" decimes due at Bordeaux |
This item is discussed in detail in this blog post. It was also featured on Postal History Sunday for Oct 25, 2020.
Belgian postage: 4 decimes
On January 10, 1831, the powers of Europe ratified Belgium’s declaration of independence, but the postal agreement operating between France and Belgium was essentially based on the 1828 agreement with the Netherlands of which Belgium had been a part. There were three distances (rayons) in Belgium with the third rayon requiring the highest rate of 4 decimes.
French postage: 10 decimes
French domestic rates were based on distance and weight. The distance would be from the border with Belgium (roughly Valenciennes) to Bordeaux (nearly 800 km).
The internal French postage rate for 7.5 grams established in January of 1828 was 1 franc (100 centimes) for internal mail that traveled 750 to 900 km.
Postal Markings for postage calculation
B.3.R.
Belgium 3rd Rayon
rate = 40 centimes / 10 grams
for 60 - 100 km
French Postage
rate = 1 franc / 7.5 grams
for 750-900 km
The effective period for this agreement governing letter mail from Belgium to France was Jan 10, 1831 to Sep 30, 1849
Postal Arrangements from 1847 - 1875
Postage rates between these two countries removed the distance component of the rate structure with the exception of special discounted rate for border communities beginning with the 1857 agreement. Also in 1858, higher rates for unpaid and short-paid mail were implemented to encourage prepayment of postage
Rates between France, Italy,
Switzerland and Belgium are simpler to understand as they worked their
way towards the "Latin Monetary Unit" in 1865. (Greece joined this
group in 1868) From a postal history perspective, this is at least
partly responsible for our being able to say that the rate in each
direction was the same (without needing to convert currency).
Postal Agreement of November 3, 1847
This agreement allowed payment to destination, payment to the border or
payment by the recipient (sent unpaid). Belgium was split into
districts (rayons) to determine rates. Also, the rate progression by
weight was not a linear progression. Note that the first rate actually
differs for the weight limit between Belgium (10 grammes) and France
(7.5 grammes). See Article 7 and 8 for details on this progression
(shown below). This agreement sets the tone for future agreements,
which make the rates simpler for letter mail.
Article 7 & 8 | Article 1 | Articles 12-14 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Exchange offices were initially set forth in this treaty, with most exchanging mail once per day and carrying local mail (such as Dunkerque and Furnes). It is likely the number of mails changed over time into the 1860's just as the list of exchange office pairings, etc increased. As rail traffic increased, the schedule of mail exchanges also increased, reflecting the actual train schedules.
3 mails per day | 2 mails per day | 1 mail per day |
---|---|---|
Lille - Tournai | Valenciennes - MIDI Lille, Roubaix, Tourcoing - Courtrai, Gand, TPO L'Ouest |
|
Postal Agreement of 1849
Other than the exception of border communities, distance was no longer a part of the rate calculation. I am guessing the rate was now a linear progression, though it would be nice to confirm this. Oddly, I have not yet found the text of this convention.
Postal Agreements of 1857 and 1865
The 1857 convention clearly broke more ground than the 1865 convention, which cites the 1857 convention throughout. The rate was reduced from 40 centimes to 30 centimes per 10 grams. No changes were made to border mail in the 1865 convention, so 1857 processes still applied.
Article 1.4 - 1857 Rate Progression |
Article 1.5 - 1857 Border Mail Rate |
Article 1 - 1865 Rate Progression |
---|---|---|
Effective Date | Rate | Unit |
---|---|---|
Oct 1, 1849 | 40 centimes | 7.5 grams (a) |
Apr 1, 1858 | 40 centimes | |
Jan 1, 1866 | 30 centimes | 10 grams |
Jan 1, 1876 (GPU) | 30 centimes | 15 grams |
May 1, 1878 (UPU) | 25 centimes | 15 grams |
Oct 1, 1907 (UPU) | 25 ctm / 15 ctm | 15 g / add'l 15 g |
(a) -
rate increments for weight may not have been linear and would require a
second table if that was the case. Still seeking confirmation of rates
and convention details.
1857 Convention Prepaid Letters
40 centimes per 10 grams: Apr 1, 1858- Dec 31, 1865
Prepaid letter mail from France to Belgium was marked with the letters "PD" to indicate that the postage had been paid in full to the destination (payée à destiné). France typically applied their paid markings in red ink.
Also, most letters included a postmark from a designated exchange office where it was placed in the mailbag in France and then removed from the mailbag for processing in Belgium. The valid pairing of exchange offices expanded over time and did not require modifications to postal conventions.
Many of these exchange offices were actually in railway cars as the mail traveled from one location to the next.
Item #2 - Paid letter from Cambrai to Tournay 1860
593 in diamond grid PD in box Apres Le Depart France par Tournay May 20 |
Cambrai,France and Tournay, Belgium served as the exchange offices
for this letter. The exchange office pairing can often give a
suggestion as to the actual route this letter took as it crossed the
French/Belgian border.
Cambrai is located Southwest of
Valenciennes, yet this item
appears to have gone to Lille and then Tournay given the "France par
Tournay" marking. One could make the argument that the Tournay
destination resulted simply in a Tournay exchange marking and the letter
took a different route to get there. However, the Apres Le Depart
marking lends itself to the idea that the most likely route (Quievrain
crossing) was not taken because the item was received after that train
had left. As a result, it took the next train on the schedule that
could get the letter to Tournay - perhaps that train through Lille.
1865 Convention Prepaid Letters
30 centimes per 10 grams - Jan 1, 1866- Dec 31, 1875
The procedure of marking letters with the "PD" continued, as did placing exchange markings on the letters as they entered mailbags and then as they were pulled out for processing in Belgium.
The possible number of routes had grown significantly with the improvements in rail travel. In fact, many of the markings show a time of day that could allow for identification of a route if an old rail schedule could be located. The abbreviations M (matin - morning) and S (soir - evening) tell you which half of the day the number applies to. 5M would be 5 AM.
Item #3 - Lille to Bruxelles 1868
Lille 25 Apr 68
PD in box
France MIDI I 26 Apr 68 (verso)
Bruxelles 26 Apr 68 (verso)St Gilles . Bruxelles 26 Apr 68 (verso) |
This item has its
origin at Lille, which is very near the border with Belgium. I assume
this took the Lille-Tournay crossing at Tourcoing but it did not receive
an exchange office marking until it arrived at MIDI station since the
destination was near Bruxelles at St Gilles.
A MIDI exchange marking could pair with a wide number of border crossings. With the Lille origin, this could very well, given the right rail schedule, have gone via Valenciennes or Quievrain. However, the simplest and most likely explanation would be the Tourcoing crossing with a significant number of mails being made up every day to go by this route. The mail train would simply turn East towards Tournay after crossing the border and continue North to Bruxelles.
Item #4 - Arras to Gand 1867
PD in box France MIDI I - Jun 14, 1867 Gand 8M - Jun 14, 1867 7 in circle - carrier/delivery marking |
Arras is located west of the rail line split, so there was a choice
between Lille (Tourcoing) or Valenciennes (Quievrain) for routing. My
guess is that this hitched a ride aboard the mail train from Paris and a
trip through Valenciennes. The MIDI I exchange supports a Quievrain
crossing since there wouldn't be much cause to go through Bruxelles to
get to Gand (Ghent) if the northern route were taken.
Like many other European cities, Gand/Ghent marked their mail with
either a carrier number or some sort of distribution number. It seems
likely that the "7 in circle" would identify a carrier or a carrier
route rather than a distribution. I do not believe Gand would have
supported seven different mail distributions. The only reason this
could a distribution number is if their distributions were given a
number based on the distribution time.
Item #5 - Reims to Namur 1868
Reims Feb 10, 1868 Paris A Givet Feb 10 1868 (verso) France Namur Feb 11 68 (verso) Namur Feb 11, 1868 |
The combination of a Reims origin and a Namur exchange marking makes me
believe that this crossed the border in the Ardennes. That rail
connection should have been complete or near completion by 1868. After
comparisons with other similar markings on items I do not own, I can
conclude that the rail marking is, indeed, Paris A Givet, which should
confirm this routing. The 11M timestamp on the Namur backstamp gives us
information regarding the scheduling of this particular mail train.
Item #6 - Arras to Anvers 1867
Gare D'Arras Sep 21, 1867 Paris A Arras Sep 21 (verso) France Par Mouscron Sep 21 3-4S (verso) Anvers Sep 21 7S (verso) |
This item adds a piece to the puzzle that I find refreshing. The
somewhat blurred France Par Mouscron marking on the back of this item
provides solid evidence of the Tourcoing crossing since Mouscron was the
Belgian town closest to the border on that rail line.
At
Mouscron, the mail could either go north towards Courtray (and on to
Gand/Ghent) or east towards Tournay. It seems most logical to go
through Ghent on the way to Anvers/Antwerp. Also of note are the time
markings on these backstamps. 3-4S and 7S markings indicate travel
after midday and a three to four hour transit time. This would be
consistent with a direct line to Anvers.
Like Item #4 this item originated in Arras. However, it was mailed at
the trainstation (Gare d'Arras) and postmarked with the rail marking "P
AR" in a diamond grid. In both cases, the train could have been routed
via Lille or Valenciennes depending on the schedule. Lille would result
in a Tourcoing crossing and Valenciennes would be Quievrain. The time
stamp for the other item in Gand is 8M, while this is 3-4S, which would
support a different train schedule between the two.
Prepaid Letter Mail: Belgium to France
The rate table is essentially a duplicate to the France to Belgium rate
table. It is here to allow ease of reference in the post with examples
of Belgian mail to France. Please note that I have NOT confirmed
effective dates with postal orders from the Belgian post office. I am
making what could be a bad assumption that they became effective at the
same time the rate was placed in effect by France.
Effective Date | Rate | Unit |
---|---|---|
Oct 1, 1849 | 40 centimes | 7.5 grams |
Apr 1, 1858 | 40 centimes | 10 grams |
Jan 1, 1866 | 30 centimes | 10 grams |
Jan 1, 1876 (GPU) | 30 centimes | 15 grams |
May 1, 1878 (UPU) | 25 centimes | 15 grams |
Oct 1, 1907 (UPU) | 25 ctm / 15 ctm | 15 g / add'l 15 g |
1857 Convention Prepaid Letters
Anvers Feb 27 1861
Ambt du Midi No 1 Feb 27 (verso)
Belg Valenciennes Feb 28 1861Paris Feb 28 1861 (verso) |
Item #9 - Mons to Paris 1864
Mons July 4, 1864
Paris July 5, 1864 (verso) |
Mons is not situated very far from the border and also not very far from Valenciennes. The actual border crossing is at Quievrain.
Mons was very much a junction point for many rail lines to various locations within Belgium and two border crossings could be taken directly from the city (the other is Erquilinnes).
Item #10 - Double rate letter, Ypres to Paris 1865
|
Ypres, March 19, 1865
France Par Mouscron Mar 19, 1865 (verso)
Belg Valenciennes Mar 20, 1865Paris Mar 20, 1865 (verso) |
We can also get some clues regarding train schedule with the time indicators on the postmarks. Ypres departure at "2S" and Mouscron departure at "7-8S." So, the train was scheduled to leave Ypres at 2PM and was at Mouscron between 7 and 8 PM that evening.
30 centimes per 10 grams - 1866-1875
Anvers Nov 30, 1867
France Par Mouscron Dec 1, 1867 (verso)
Belgique Lille Dec 1 1867
Lille Dec 1, 1867 (verso)Calais Dec 2, 1867 (verso) |
Montigny-sur-Sambre (dateline)
Charleroy Mar 6, 1866
France par Chimay Mar 6 (verso)
Belg Avesnes Mar 6
Equilines A Paris Mar 6(verso)Charleville Mar 7 (verso) |
Effective Date | Rate | Unit |
---|---|---|
Oct 1, 1849 | 20 centimes | 7.5 grams |
Apr 1, 1858 | 20 centimes | 10 grams |
Jan 1, 1866 | 20 centimes | 10 grams |
Border mail still required the indication that an item was fully paid, short paid or unpaid. So, paid border mail in both directions will show a "PD" marking.
The following pieces of the convention illustrate the border mail regulations and provide a list of locations that would benefit from the special rate.
1849 | 1858 | 1866 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
There were numerous small communities that served as mail exchange offices for local border mail. For example, the 1847 convention lists several exchange office pairings that are clearly for local mails:
- Avesnes (France) with Mons (to its north) and Chimay (to its East)
- Dunkerque with Furnes (on the Channel)
- Givet with Dinant (Ardennes)
- Longwy with Arlon (by Luxembourg)
- Maubauge (between Avesnes and Mons) with Mons
- Roeroy with Couvin (south Ardennes)
- Sedan with Bouillon (southeast Belgium)
- Thionville with Arlon (by Luxembourg)
- Trelon with Chimay (south of Avesnes)
- Tourcoing and Roubaix with Courtray
Of course, some of these offices were used for the transfer of other mail, especially as rail lines proliferated. Avesnes, Givet and Dinant each served more area than the immediate communities that were nearby.
1857 Convention Border Rate Paid
Courtray 10M Mar 28, 1865
France par Mouscron 9-10M Mar 28 (verso)
Belgique Lille Mar 28
Lille Mar 28 (verso) |
Border Crossings
It is instructive to take a look at the border crossings for this time period to get a sense for the routes and corresponding times for mail transfer between the two countries. Below is a Belgian rail map showing active lines around 1875, this give an overview of what might have been available at various points from the 1840s to 1875. Click to see a larger version.
I will take a moment to discuss each crossing briefly from North to South.
Tourcoing Crossing (Lille, Roubaix, and Tourcoing with Mouscron, Courtray, and Tournay): This
crossing served local mails as well as mail from and funneled through
Paris. With significant mail train traffic already between Calais and
Paris for mails from England as well as mails across the Atlantic, Lille
was an obvious location to either drop off mails intended to enter
Belgium or run a train direct from Paris through Lille.
This crossing was highly utilized even as early as the 1847 convention (and before) with multiple mails being made up to cross the border each day.
Quievrain Crossing (Valenciennes with Mons and MIDI Station): Mail via Valenciennes headed for Bruxelles (and MIDI Station) was also listed in the 1847 as having more than one mail per day. Especially early on, it is likely mail to/from the western portion of Belgium tended to go via Tourcoing and mail to/from the eastern portion via Quievrain.
As rail schedules and lines expanded, mail to and from the larger population centers would take the mail train that would get the mail to the destination fastest - even if it wasn't the most direct route.
Quevy Crossing (Mauberge and Mons): This rail line was developed later than several of the others and provided another option to get to Mons, which provided multiple options for rail traffic in all directions. I have not seen a marking for Quevy specifically and anticipate that identifying this crossing for a piece of mail would require rail schedules.
Erquelines Crossing (Mauberge and Jeumont): Also spelled Erquilinnes, this rail line was also developed early, providing access to Liege and the Belgian/Prussian border. Letter mail to and from Prussia and other countries to the Northeast would often transit Belgium on its way to or from France. Mails to and from Hannover, Prussia and the Netherlands frequently show a French transit mark for this route. Occasionally a person can find a cover from the United States that will display this same transit marking.
Chimay Crossing (Avesnes, Macon and Trelon): This crossing was available as a stage crossing for local mails and the Chimay Railway was developed by private interests, becoming active sometime between 1865 and 1869 according to maps of the area from those periods.
Vireux Crossing (Couvin,Vireux): This rail was also developed in the 1860s and probably carried mostly local and regional mail.
A map from 1861 shows a rail line approaching the peninsula shaped area
of France jutting into Belgium in the Ardennes. The train route in
Belgium was open in 1854 to Vireux - Molhain (in France), but there was
apparently no adjoining French train by 1861. The line out of Rheims
should have been developed by the mid-1860's. An 1865 map of Belgium
does not show a connection here, but a map by the same producer does
show its presence in the 1869 version. It seems to me that the Givet
route would have more value except for local mail.
Givet Crossing (Givet, Dinant): Givet is located further north in the peninsula shaped protrusion of the French border into Belgium. I have viewed a 1864 ambulatory rail marking for Givet, which seems to confirm completion of the Florennes to Givet line that was completed June 23, 1862. Once a the full connection was made to Namur, this route could support a Paris mail train that would run East to Aachen similar to the Erquelines crossing.
Luxembourg Area Crossings (Neufchatel, Arlon, Thionville): This area might deserve more of my attention in the future. Thionville was a fairly important exchange office prior to the 1847 convention. By the time we get into the 1850s, 60s and 70s it seems that mail sent by these routes would be regional in nature.
Notes About Railways & Exchange Offices
(Paris with Gand and TPO L'Ouest) Belgium's western mail lines centered around Gand (Ghent) provided the connection to the port of Ostende, which was critical for Belgium's ability to serve the transit of mail from the United Kingdom and off continent to France and the German states.
Paris could exchange mail with both the Gand office and the traveling Traveling Post Office - L'OuestThese frequently using the Tourcoing crossing, though this crossing becomes less of a lock as rail line schedules became more complex in the 1860s.
(MIDI Station) It is unclear to me whether the MIDI station
exchange markings provide any specific indication as to the route the mailbag took (or was to take). Those markings that include a time could allow a person to deduce the route with a rail schedule. MIDI Station exchange marks appear to be one of the most frequently encountered for Belgian/French mail during this period.
I have observed several items leaving Belgium for Spain or Italy that exhibit a MIDI II marking that includes the destination country in the marking.
Initially, the MIDI was located in Brussels as the station for the early line to Mons. It was moved to St Gilles (just outside Brussels) in 1864 to handle the higher volume of traffic. Mail exiting Belgium would likely leave via Mons early on. But as rail options proliferated, letters leaving the MIDI station could leave at any border (and thus enter from any border).
By the 1847 convention, the MIDI traveling rail office would exchange
with Valenciennes and Paris offices. Valenciennes was scheduled for two
mails in 1847 (and was likely increased later).
ART. LXV. The ancient United Provinces of the Netherlands and the late Belgic provinces, both within the limits fixed by the following Article, shall form, together with the countries and territories designated in the same article, under the sovereignty of his Royal Highness the Prince of Orange-Nassau, sovereign prince of the United Provinces, the kingdom of the Netherlands, hereditary in the order of succession already established by the Act of the constitution of the said United Provinces. The title and the prerogatives of the royal dignity are recognised by all the Powers in the house of Orange-Nassau.
On October 4, 1830, Belgium declared independence from the Netherlands. The current powers of Europe intervened and ratified this on January 10, 1831. The final treaty signed on Oct 15, 1831 left Luxembourg with the Netherlands and recognized Belgium, but Netherlands refused to sign that treaty. War persisted between the Netherlands and Belgium for eight more years. A second treaty (Treaty of London - 1839) signed April 19, 1839 set the boundaries that would be in use when postage stamps began to see use. These borders, interestingly enough, were fairly similar to those found in 1790.
My "go to" site for determining French rates. Data appears to be backed up by postal acts and agreements.
Duvergier, Jean Baptiste, "Collection complete de lois, decrets, d'interets general ... par France"
After a much appreciated suggestion by Laurent on the altpostgeschichte forum, I can now provide links to the French version of both the 1858 and 1866 convention documents.
1857: Is in volume 58
1865: Is in volume 65
Greuse (ed.), "Recueil des traites et conventions concernant le royaume du Belgique," 1850.
Here we have the Belgian counterpart for treaty and convention texts. Page 545 includes the 1847 version of exchange offices between France and Belgium.
General Treaty/Final Act of the Congress of Vienna, June 9, 1815
Actual treaty text in English (language used for official documents was French - the language of diplomacy at that time). It is located on WikiSource which is getting better at providing access to the text of original documents such as this. It is instructive to read how this treaty set up Europe after the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo (which was not at all certain at the time of the Congress of Vienna).
LeBecque, Emmanuel, Histoire Postale du Nord, 2014
Lebecque includes several portions of conventions and official postal acts that apply to his area of interest. The three sections for border mail are included on his site and I have "shamelessly" taken them for the purpose of illustrating the border mail rate from the French perspective.
Kevers, Paul - Belgian Rail Lines
There is a great deal of work here identifying each spur and its development. I am inclined to trust what appears to be a pure labor of love in the effort of accumulating this information, but I have not spent time confirming the dates shown there. There is even an animation to show development of lines in Belgium to 1855.
Busschots, Bart - Belgian Railway History Project
This takes it all to a new level. Mr. Busschots gives credit to Mr. Kevers to get him going. But, now he is using Google maps to try and identify the actual historical locations of the rail beds. While I haven't had the time to download the software required, I may just find the time and bandwidth to do so just to see his work.
History of the Gare du Midi District
For a site that is concerned about providing current information and status of the projects in this district, it certainly has a decent historical summary.
von Adolphe Hochsteyn, Dictionnaire-postal de la Belgique, up to 1845.
- Letter Mail: France and the Netherlands
- French Postal Agreements
- Writing Home to Family - Postal History Sunday
- Borderline Benefits - Postal History Sunday
- also note links for specific covers linked below their image (when they exist)
Much of this work has already been done by Jean Bourgoin:
ReplyDeletehttp://jean-louis.bourgouin.pagesperso-orange.fr/Tarifs%20Postaux.htm
Indeed, I agree Mr. Walske. :) You'll note a link to his site in the resources section. But, I often find it useful to reiterate/rephrase or otherwise reprise data in my own way to encourage my exploration of the subject. That - and my French is not all that good. So, if I can do a some translating for myself for later times when I just don't have the patience to work with the French...
ReplyDeleteJean Bourgouin's site is absolutely wonderful and I respect the work put into it! Thanks for confirming.
Rob
Noted! I didn't mean to suggest that you were mis-using his work; I just wanted to save you time, since he has put so much into his website. I didn't notice that you listed him as a reference...
DeleteI took it the way you intended it. Agreed, I do not need to duplicate his work. It is, instead, just a way for me to visualize the whole picture and explore what I think I want to know about it. I don't foresee doing this for every combination of rates since I don't see this as becoming a reference site nor do I think I'll feel like exploring every little option. France/Belgium and France/Netherlands seemed like a fairly well-contained template to see if it helped me with the process. It did - some. Appreciate any and all feedback as I see it all as a learning experience.
DeleteThe 1849 postal treaty was a "supplementary treaty". It's quite short, only a few pages. I have the French text if you're interested. (dr.ivo@ivosteijn.com)
ReplyDeleteAnd that likely explains why I missed it. Well, that and, I don't have anything that fits that treaty in my collection - so the motivation to chase it down was lessened. Even so, this is a good enough summary that I should complete that portion.
Delete